History of Romanians
by Ion Calafeteanu
Romania is situated in Central Europe, in the northern
part of the Balkan peninsula. Its territory is marked by the Carpathian Mountains,
the Danube and the Black Sea. With its temperate climate and varied natural
environment, which is favorable to life, the Romanian territory has been inhabited
since time immemorial. The research done by Romanian archaeologists at Bugiulesti,
Valcea Country, has led to the discovery of traces of human presence dating
back as early as the Lower Palaeolithic (approximately two million years BC).

Cucuteni pottery |
|
These vestiges are among the oldest in Europe, revealing a period when
"man," a humanoid in fact, went physically and spiritually through the
stages of his coming out of the animal status. A denser human population,
("the Neanderthal man") can be proved to have lived about 100,000 years
ago; a relatively stable population can only be found beginning with the
Neolithic (6-5,000 years BC).
|
| At the time, the population on the territory of present-day
Romania created a remarkable culture, whose proof is the polychrome pottery
of the "Cucuteni" culture (comparable to the pottery of other important
European cultures of the time in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle
East) and the statuettes of the "Hamangia" culture (the Thinker of
Hamangia is known today to the whole world). |

The Thinkers of Hamangia (Neolithic statuette) |
At the turn of the second millennium, when the
Palaeolithic age made way for the Bronze age, the Thracian tribes of Indo-European
origin settled alongside the population that already lived in the Carpathian-Balkan
region. From the time of the Thracians on, the uninterrupted phenomenon of the
Romanian people’s birth can be traced. In the former half of the first millennium
BC, in the Carpathian-Danube-Pontic area - which was the northern part of the
large surface inhabited by the Thracian tribes - a northern Thracian group became
individualized: it was made up of a mosaic of Getae and Dacian tribes. Strabo,
a famous geographer and historian in the age of emperor Augustus, informs that
"the Dacians have the same language as the Getae".

A Geto-Dacian nobleman (tarabostes)
wearing the traditional pileus on his head |
|
Basically, it was the same people, the only difference between the Dacians
and the Getae being the area they inhabited: the Dacians - mostly in the
mountains and the plateau of Transylvania; the Getae - in the Danube Plains.
In the Antiquity, the Greeks, who first got to encounter the Getae - used
this name for the whole population north of the Danube, while the Romans,
who first got to encounter the Dacians-extended this name to cover all
the other tribes on the present-day territory of Romania; after the conquest
of this territory, the Romans created here the Dacia province. This is
why the whole territory of present-day Romania is called Dacia in all
ancient Latin and Early Middle Ages sources.
|
The contact of the Geto-Dacians with the Greek
world was made easy by the Greek colonies created on the present-day Romanian
Black Sea shore: Istros (Histria), founded in the 7th century BC, Callatis (today:
Mangalia) and Tomi (today: Constanta); the latter two were founded a century
later. In the recorded history, the population north of the Danube (the Getae)
was first mentioned by Herodotus, "the father of history" (the 4th century BC).
He told the story of the campaign of Persian king Darius I against the Scythians
in the northern Pontic steppes (513 BC). He wrote that the Getae were "the most
valiant and just of the Thracians". They had been the only ones to resist the
Persian king on the way from the Bosphorus to the Danube.

The Dacian stronghold of Sarmisegetuza |
|
Burebista (82 - around 44 BC), who succeeded to unite the Geto-Dacian
tribes for the first time, founded a powerful kingdom that stretched,
when the Dacian sovereign offered to support Pompey against Caesar (48
BC), from the Beskids (north), the Middle Danube (west), the Tyras river
(the Dniester), and the Black Sea shore (east) to the Balkan Mountains
(south).
|
In the 1st century BC, as the Roman empire was
expanding and Roman provinces were being created in Pannonia, Dalmatia, Moesia
and Thracia, the Danube became, along 1,500 Km., the border between the Roman
Empire and the Dacian world. In Dobrudja, which was under Roman rule for seven
centuries beginning with the reign of Augustus, poet Publius Ovidius Naso spent
the last years of his life, "among Greeks and Getae," as he was exiled there,
to Tomi (8-17, AD) by order of the same Caesar.
Romanians are nowadays the only descendants of the Eastern Roman stock; the Romanian language is one of the major heirs of
the Latin language, together with French, Italian, Spanish; Romania is an oasis
of Latinity in this part of Europe.

The Roman mosaic of Tomis (Constanta) |
|
The natives, be they of Roman or Daco-Roman origin, continued their
uninterrupted existence as farmers and shepherds even after the withdrawal,
under emperor Aurelian (270-275) of the Roman army and administration,
which were moved south of the Danube. But the ancestors of the Romanians
remained for several centuries in the political, economic, religious and
cultural sphere of influence of the Roman Empire; after the empire split
in 395 AD, they stayed in the sphere of the Byzantine Empire. They lived
mostly in the old Roman hearts that had now decayed and survived in difficult
circumstances under successive waves of migratory tribes.
|
At the time when the Daco-Roman ethno-cultural
symbiosis was achieved and finalized in the 6-7th centuries by the formation
of the Romanian people, in the 2-4th centuries, the Daco-Romans adopted Christianity
in a Latin garb.
Therefore, in the 6-7th centuries, when the formation process of the Romanian people came to an end, this nation emerged in history as a
Christian one. This is why, unlike the neighboring nations, which have established
dates of Christianization (the Bulgarians - 865, the Serbs - 874, the Poles-966,
the eastern Slavs - 988, the Hungarians - the year 1000), the Romanians do not
have a fixed date of Christianization, as they were the first Christian nation
in the region.
In the 4-13th centuries the Romanian people had to face the waves of migratory peoples - the Getae, the Huns, the Gepidae, the
Avars, the Slavs, the Petchenegs, the Cumanians, the Tartars - who crossed the
Romanian territory.
The migratory tribes controlled this space from
the military and political points of view, delaying the economic and social
development of the natives and the formation of local statehood entities.
The Slavs, who massively settled since the 7th
century south of the Danube, split the compact mass of Romanians in the Carpathian-Danubian
area: the ones to the north (the Daco-Romanians) were separated from the ones
to the south, who were moved towards the west and Southeast of the Balkan Peninsula
(Aromanians, Megleno-Romanians and Istro-Romanians). The Slavs that settled
north of the Danube were assimilated little by little by the Romanian people
and their language left traces in the vocabulary and phonetics of the Romanian
language. To the Romanian language, the Slavic language (similarly to the Germanic
idiom of the Franks with the French people) was the so-called super-imposed
layer. The Romanians belonged to the Orthodox religion so they adopted the Old
Church Slavic as a cult language, and, beginning with the 14-16th centuries,
as a chancery and culture language. The Slavic language was never a living language,
spoken by the people, on the territory of Romania; it played for Romanians,
at a certain time during the Middle Ages, the same role that Latin played in
the West; in the early modern age it was replaced for ever, in church, chancery
and culture included, by the Romanian language.
Owing to their position, the Romanians south of
the Danube were the first to be mentioned in historical sources (the 10th century),
under the name of vlahi or blahi (Wallachians); this name shows
they were speakers of a Romance language and that the the non-Roman peoples around them admitted this fact. .
After the year 602, the Slavs massively settled
south of the Danube and they established a powerful Bulgarian czardom in the
9th century; this, cut the tie between the Romanian world north of the Danube
and the one south of the Danube. As they were subject to all sorts of pressure
and isolated from the powerful Romanian trunk north of the Danube, the number
of Romanians south of the Danube continuously decreased, while their kin north of the Danube, although living in extremely difficult conditions, continued
their historical evolution as a separate nation, the farthest one to the east
among the descendants of Imperial Rome.
In fact the Romanians are the only ones who, through
their very name - roman - (coming from the Latin word "Roman") - have preserved
to this day in this part of Europe the seal of the ancestors, of their descent,
that they have always been aware of. This will show later in the name of the
nation state - Romania.
Wallachia, Moldavia, Transylvania
Beginning with the 10th century, the Byzantine,
Slav and Hungarian sources, and later on the western sources mention the existence
of statehood entities of the Romanian population - kniezates and voivodates
- first in Transylvania and Dobrudja, then in the 12-13th centuries, also in
the lands east and south of the Carpathians. A specific trait of the Romanian’s
history from the Middle Ages until the modern times is that they lived in three
Principalities that were neighbors, but autonomous - Wallachia, Moldavia and
Transylvania.
This phenomenon - which is by no means unique in
Mediaeval Europe - is extremely complex. The underlying causes pertain to the
essence of the feudal society, but there are also specific factors. Among the
latter, we wish to mention the existence of powerful neighboring empires, which
opposed the unification of the Romanian state entities and even occupied - for
shorter or longer periods of time - Romanian territories. For instance, to the
west the Romanians had to face the policy of conquests conducted by the Hungarian
kingdom. In 895, the Hungarian tribes, who came from the Volga lands, led by
Arpad, settled in Pannonia. They were stopped in their progress towards the
west by emperor Otto I (995) so the Hungarians settled down and turned their
eyes to the south-east and east. There they encountered the Romanians.
A Hungarian chronicle describes the meeting between
the messengers sent by Arpad, the Hungarian king, and voivode Menumorut of the
Biharea city in western Transylvania. The Hungarian ambassadors demanded that
the territory be handed over to them. The chronicle has preserved for us the
dignified answer given by Menumorut: "Tell Arpad, the Duke of Hungary, your
ruler. Verily we owe him, as a friend to a friend, to give him all that is necessary
because he is a foreigner and a stranger and lacks many. But the land that he
has demanded from our good will we shall never give to him, as long as we are
alive".

The Church of Densus |
|
Despite the resistance of the Romanian kniezates and voivodates, the
Hungarians succeeded in the 10-13th centuries to occupy Transylvania and
make it part of the Hungarian kingdom (until the beginning of the 16th
century as an autonomous voivodate.) In order to consolidate their power
in Transylvania, where the Romanians continued to be, over the centuries,
the great majority ethnic element, as well as to defend the southern and
eastern borders of the voivodate, the Hungarian crown resorted to the
colonization of Szecklers and Germans (Saxons) in the 12-13th centuries
in the frontier areas.
|

Scene from the Painted Chronicle of Vienna showing
the victory of the Romanians at Posada (1330)
against the army of the Hungarian King |
| In the 14th century, with the decline of the neighboring imperial
powers (the Poles, the Hungarians, the Tartars), south and east of the Carpathian
Mountains range the autonomous feudal states were formed: Wallachia, under
Basarab I (around 1310) and Moldavia, under Bogdan I (around
1359). The Polish and Hungarian kingdoms attempted in the 14-15th centuries
to annex or subordinate the two principalities, but they did not succeed. |
In the second half of the 14th century a new threat
against the Romanian lands emerged: the Ottoman Empire. After first setting
foot on European soil in 1354, the Ottoman Turks began their rapid expansion
on the continent, so the green banner of the Islam already flew south of the
Danube in 1396.
Alone or in alliance with the
neighboring Christian countries, more often in alliance with the neighboring
voivodes of the other two Romanian principalities, the voivodes of Wallachia
Mircea the Old (1386-1418) and Vlad the Impaler (Dracula
of the Mediaeval legends, 1456-1462), with Stephen the Great and Holy
(1457-1504), the voivode of Moldavia and Iancu of Hunedoara, the
voivode of Transylvania (1441-1456) fought heavy defence battles against
the Ottoman Turks, delaying their expansion to Central Europe.
The whole Balkan Peninsula became a Turkish-ruled
territory, Constantinople was captured by Mohammed II (1453), Suleiman the Magnificent
captured the city of Belgrade (1521), and the Hungarian kingdom disappeared
following the battle of Mohacs (1526). Therefore, Wallachia and Moldavia were
surrounded and they had to recognize for over three centuries the suzerainty
of the Ottoman Empire. After Buda was captured and Hungary became a pashalik,
Transylvania became a self-ruling principality (1541) and it, too, recognized
the suzerainty of the Ottoman Empire, as the other two Romanian lands.
| Unlike all the other peoples of south-east Europe, unlike
the Hungarians and the Poles, the Romanians were the only ones who maintained
their state entity during the Middle Ages, along with their own political,
military and administrative structures. The tribute paid to the sultan was
the guarantee for the preservation of domestic autonomy, but also for the
protection against more powerful enemies. |

City of Soroca on the Dnister river bank |

The Curtea de Arges Monastery, founded by Neagoe Basarab
(1512-1521), Prince of Wallachia |
|
Wallachia and Moldavia, owing to their autonomy status, continued after
the fall of the Byzantine Empire to foster their Byzantine cultural traditions,
taking at the same time upon themselves to protect the Eastern Orthodox
religion; on their territory, scholars from all over the Balkan Peninsula,
chased away by the intolerant Islam, were able to continue their work
without any obstacles; they prepared the cultural revival of their nations.
|
| The end of the 16th century was dominated by the personality
of Michael the Brave. He became voivode of Wallachia in 1593, joined
the Christian League - an anti-Ottoman coalition initiated by the Papacy
and the Holy Roman Empire and he succeeded, following heavy battles (Calugareni,
Giurgiu) to actually regain the independence of his country. In 1599-1600
he united for the first time in history all the territories inhabited by
Romanians, proclaiming himself "prince of Wallachia, Transylvania and the
whole of Moldavia." The domestic situation was very complex, the neighboring
great-powers - the Ottoman Empire, Poland, the Hapsburg Empire - were hostile
and joined forces to overthrow him; so this union was short-lived as Michael
the Brave was assassinated in 1601. |

Michael the Brave (1593-1601),
prince of Wallachia,
the first to unite the Romanian feudal states |
|

Michael the Brave entering Alba Iulia on November 1, 1599
|
| The union achieved by the valiant voivode became, however,
a symbol to the posterity. In the 17th century, in various forms and with
evanescent success, other princes attempted to restart the ambitious political
program of Michael the Brave, by trying to form a united anti-Ottoman front,
made-up of the three principalities and to restore the unity of ancient
Dacia.
Michael the Brave (1593-1601) who first united the three Romanian lands.
|
The end of the 17th century and the beginning of
the 18th century brought about changes in the politics of Central and Eastern
Europe. The Ottoman Empire failed to capture Vienna in 1683 and following that,
the Hapsburg Empire began its expansion to the south-east of Europe. The Austrian-Turkish
peace treaty of Karlowitz (1699) sanctioned the annexation of Transylvania and
its organization as an autonomous principality to Hapsburg Austria (since 1765
great principality), ruled by a governor. Poland was divided and Russia, by
successive conquests, reached under Peter the Great (1696-1725) the Dniester
river, thus becoming Moldavia’s eastern neighbor.
The ambitious dream of the czars to dominate the
Bosporus strait and Constantinople placed the Romanian Principalities in the
way of Russian expansionism. The Ottoman Empire, in an attempt to defend its
old position, introduced in Moldavia (1711) and Wallachia (1716) the "Phanariot
regime," (until 1821), under which the Sublime Porte appointed in the two
principalities Greek voivodes recruited from the Phanar district of Istanbul
and considered faithful to the Turks. That was a time when the Ottoman political
control and economic exploitation increased and corruption spread; but some
social reforms were also introduced - such as the abolition of serfdom - as
well as administrative and modernizing reforms, modeled on the European ones
in the age of the Enlightenment. The domestic autonomy, although limited, was
basically preserved and the two principalities continued to be distinct entities
from the Ottoman Empire; this situation was recognized in several international
treaties (for instance that of Kuchuk-Kainargi, 1774). Lying at the borders
of three great empires and wanted by all three of them, Wallachia and Moldavia
became for over 150 years not only territories of contention but also a battlefield
on which the armies of the empires fought each other.
Many wars were fought by Austria and Russia against
the Ottoman Empire (1710-1711, 1716-1718, 1735-1739, 1768-1774, 1787-1792, 1806-1812,
1828-1829, 1853-1856): those battles took place on Romanian soil, always
accompanied by a foreign military occupation, which was often maintained long
after the war proper was over, so the Romanian lands endured not only through
devastation and irrecoverable losses but also through population displacements
and painful territory amputations. So, Austria temporarily annexed Oltenia (1718-1793)
and Northern Moldavia that they called Bukovina (1775-1918). Following the Russian-Turkish
war of 1806-1812, Russia annexed the eastern part of Moldavia, the land between
the Prut and Dniester rivers, later called Bessarabia (1812-1918).
National Revival
In the 18th and early 19th centuries huge economic
and social changes took place, the feudal structures were deeply eroded, the
first capitalist enterprises emerged and at the same time Romanian goods were
attracted step by step into the European circuit. The national idea, as everywhere
else in Europe, was becoming the soaring dream of intellectuals and the underlying
element in the plans for the future made by the politicians.
| The union of part of the clergy in Transylvania with the Catholic
Church (the Greek- Catholics), achieved by the House of Hapsburg in 1699-1701,
played an important part in the emancipation of Transylvanian Romanians.
Their fight for equal rights with the other ethnic groups (although the
Romanians accounted for over 60% of the principate’s population, they were
still considered "tolerated" in their own country) was begun by Bishop
Inocentiu Micu-Klein and continued by the intellectuals grouped in the
"Transylvanian School" movement: Gheorghe Sincai, Petru Maior,
Samuil Micu, Ion Budai-Deleanu, a.o. |

Greek-Catholic bishop Inocentiu Micu-Klein (1692-1768), promoter of the
national struggle
of the Romanians in Transylvania |
These scholars proved the Latinity of the Romanian
language and people and, even more, the fact that they had uninterruptedly been
the autochthonous population here. By virtue of this ancients, they demanded
equal rights with the other "nations" in Transylvania - Hungarians, Szecklers
and Saxons. The claims of the Romanians in Transylvania were submitted to the
Court of Vienna in the long petition called Supplex Libellus Valachorum
(1791), which did not receive any answer.
|

Tudor Vladimirescu, the leader of the 1821 Romanian revolution
|
The quest for renewal in Wallachia was expressed in the revolution
led by Tudor Vladimirescu (1821), which broke out at the same time
with the Greek’s movement for liberation.
|
Although the Ottoman and Czarist troops occupied
the Danube principalities that same year, the sacrifices made by the Romanians
brought about the abolition of the Phanariot regime and native voivodes were
again appointed on the thrones of Moldavia and Wallachia. The peace treaty of
1829 signed at Adrianople (today Edirne) ended the Russian-Turkish conflict
of 1828-1829, which had broken out in the final stage of the war for national
liberation fought by the Greeks; this treaty greatly weakened the Ottoman suzerainty,
but it increased Russia’s "protectorate." Now that trade was freed, Romanian
cereals began to penetrate European markets. Under Pavel Kiseleff, the commander
of the Russian troops that occupied the two Romanian principalities (1828-1834),
quasi-identical Organic Regulations were introduced in Wallachia (1831) and
Moldavia (1832); until 1859 these Regulations served as fundamental laws (constitutions)
and they contributed to the modernisation and homogenisation of the social,
economic, administrative and political structures that had started in the preceding
decades. Therefore, in the first half of the 19th century, the Romanian principalities
began to distance themselves from the Oriental Ottoman world and tune into the
spiritual space of Western Europe. Ideas, currents, attitudes from the West
were more than welcome in the Romanian world, which was undergoing an irreversible
process of modernization. Now the awareness that all Romanians belong to the
same nation was generalized and the union into one single independent state
became the ideal of all Romanians.
Union and Independence
The winds of 1848 also blew over the Romanian principalities.
| They brought to the centre-stage of politics several brilliant
intellectuals such as Ion Heliade Radulescu, Nicolae Balcescu, Mihail
Kogalniceanu, Simion Barnutiu, Avram Iancu and others. |

Nicolae Balcescu, one of the 1848 revolution leaders |
In Moldavia the unrest was quickly cracked down
on, but in Wallachia the revolutionaries actually governed the country in June-September
1848.
|

Avram Iancu,
leader of the 1848 Romanian revolution in Transylvania
|
| In Transylvania the revolution was prolonged until as late
as 1849. There, the Hungarian leaders refused to take into account the claims
of the Romanians and they resolved to annex Transylvania to Hungary; this
led to a split of the revolutionary forces between the Hungarians and the
Romanians. The Hungarian government of Kossuth Lajos attempted to crack
down on the fight of the Romanians, but he encountered the resolute armed
resistance of the Romanians in the Apuseni Mountains, under the leadership
of Avram Iancu. |
Although the brutal intervention of the Ottoman,
Czarist and Hapsburg armies was successful in 1848-1849, the renewal tide favoring
democratic ideas spread everywhere in the next decade.
Russia was defeated in the Crimean War (1853-1856)
and this called into question again the fragile European balance. Owing to their
strategic position at the mouth of the Danube, as this waterway was becoming
increasingly important to European communications, the status of the Danube
principalities became a European issue at the peace Congress in Paris (February-March
1856). Wallachia and Moldavia were still under Ottoman suzerainty, but now they
were placed under the collective guarantee of the seven powers that signed the
Paris peace treaty; these powers decided then that local assemblies be convened
to decide on the future organization of the two principalities. The Treaty of
Paris also stipulated: the retrocession to Moldavia of Southern Bessarabia,
which had been annexed in 1812 by Russia (the Cahul, Bolgrad and Ismail counties);
freedom of sailing on the Danube; the establishment of the European Commission
of the Danube; the neutral status of the Black Sea.
In 1857 the "Ad-hoc assemblies" convened in Bucharest
and Iasi under the provisions of the Paris Peace Congress of 1856; all social
categories participated and these assemblies unanimously decided to unite the
two principalities into one single state. French emperor Napoleon III supported
this, the Ottoman Empire and Austria were against, so a new conference of the
seven protector powers was called in Paris (May-August 1858); there, only a
few of the Romanians’ claims were approved.
| But the Romanians elected on January 5/17, 1859 in Moldavia
and on January 24/February 5, 1859 in Wallachia Colonel Alexandru Ioan
Cuza as their unique prince, achieving de facto the union of the two
principalities.
The Romanian nation state took on January 24/February 5, 1862 the name
of ROMANIA and settled its capital in Bucharest.
|

Alexandru Ioan Cuza (1859-1866),
Voivove of the United Principalities |
|

Mihail Kogalniceanu (1817-1890),
father of the program to make Romania a modern country
|
| Assisted by Mihail Kogalniceanu, his closest adviser,
Alexandru Ioan Cuza initiated a reform program, which contributed to the
modernization of the Romanian society and state structures: the law to secularise
monastery assets (1863), the land reform, providing for the liberation of
the peasants from the burden of feudal duties and the granting of land to
them (1864), the Penal Code law, the Civilian Code law (1864), the education
law, under which primary school became tuition free and compulsory (1864),
the establishment of universities in Iasi (1860) and Bucharest (1864), a.o. |
| After the abdication of Alexandru Ioan Cuza (1866), Carol
of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, a relative of the royal family of Prussia,
who was supported by Napoleon III and Bismark, was proclaimed on May 10,
1866, following a plebiscite, ruling prince of Romania, with the name of
Carol I. |

Carol I, first King of Romania |
The new Constitution (inspired from the Belgian
one of 1831), which was promulgated in 1866 and was in use until 1923, proclaimed
Romania a constitutional monarchy. In the next decade the struggle of the Romanians
to achieve full state independence was part of the movements that took place
with other peoples in the south-east of Europe - Serbs, Hungarians, Montenegrins,
Bulgarians, Albanians - to cut off their last ties to the Ottoman Empire. Within
a favorable international framework - in 1875 the Oriental crisis broke out
again and the Russo-Turkish war started in April 1877 - Romania declared its
full state independence on May 9/21, 1877. The government led by Ion C. Bratianu,
in which Mihail Kogalniceanu served as Foreign Minister, decided, upon the Russian
request for assistance, to join the Russian forces that were operative in Bulgaria.
|

Attack of Grivita stronghold
Engraving of the Independence War period (1877-1878)
|
A Romanian army, under the personal
command of Prince Carol I, crossed the Danube and participated in the siege
of Pleven; the result was the surrender of the Ottoman army led by Osman
Pasha (December 10, 1877). |
The independence of Romania, similarly to that
Serbia and Montenegro, as well as the union of Dobrudja with Romania were recognized
in the Russian-Turkish peace treaty of San Stefano (March 3, 1878). Upon the
insistence of the great powers, an international peace Congress was held in
Berlin (June-July 1878), which acknowledged and maintained the status that Romania
had proclaimed by herself more than a year before; it also re-established, after
a long period of Ottoman rule, Romania’s rights over Dobrudja, which was re-united
to Romania. But at the same time Russia violated the convention signed on April
4, 1877 and forced Romania to cede the Cahul, Bolgrad and Ismail counties of
Southern Bessarabia.
On March 14/26, 1881, Romania proclaimed itself
a kingdom and Carol I of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen was crowned King of Romania.
After gaining its independence, the Romania state
was the place to which the hopeful eyes of all Romanians who lived on the lands
still under foreign occupation turned. The Romanians in Bukovina and in Bessarabia
were facing a systematic policy of assimilation into the German and Russian
worlds, respectively. Immigration of foreign peoples was directed to their territory.
The Romanian enclaves in the Balkan Peninsula had increasing difficulties in
opposing the denationalization tendencies. At the turn of the 20th century,
the Romanians were a people with over 12 million inhabitants, of whom almost
half lived under foreign occupation.
At the same time in Transylvania, the Romanians
suffered the serious consequences of the accord by which the Hungarian state
was re-established more than three centuries after its collapse and the dual
Austria-Hungary state was created (1867). Transylvania lost the autonomous status
it had under Austrian rule and it was incorporated into Hungary. The legislation
passed by the government in Budapest, which proclaimed the existence of only
one nationality in Hungary - the Magyar one - sought to destroy from the ethno-cultural
point of view the other populations, by forcing them to become Hungarian. This
subjected the Romanian population, along with other ethnic groups, to heavy
ordeals. At that time the National Romanian Party in Transylvania played an
important role in asserting the Romanian national identity; the party was reorganized
in 1881 and it became the standard bearer in the struggle to achieve recognition
of equal rights of the Romanian nation and it the resistance against the denationalization
projects.
| In 1892 the national struggle of the Romanians reached a climax
through the Memorandum Movement. The memorandum was drafted by the leaders
of the Romanians in Transylvania, Ion Ratiu, Gheorghe Pop of Basesti,
Eugen Brote, Vasile Lucaciu, a.o. and it was sent to Vienna to be submitted
to emperor Franz Joseph I; it advised the European public opinion of the
Romanians’ claims and of the intolerance shown by the government in Budapest
regarding the national issue. |

The Group of memorandum champions,
members of the Romanian National Party of Transylvania, sentenced to hard
years of prison by the
Hungarian courts of law in 1894 |
The 1878-1914 period was one of stability and progress
for Romania. Politics got polarized around two huge parties - the conservative
one (Lascar Catargiu, P.P. Carp, Gh. Grigore Cantacuzino, Titu Maiorescu,
a.o.) and the liberal one (Ion C. Bratianu, Dimitrie A. Sturdza, Ion I.C.
Bratianu, a.o.). They alternatively came to power and this became the characteristic
trait of the epoch’s politics.
The expansionist policy of Russia determined Romania
to sign in 1883 a secret alliance treaty with Austria-Hungary, Germany and Italy;
the treaty was renewed periodically until World War I. After staying neutral
in the first Balkan war (1912-1913) Romania joined Greece, Serbia, Montenegro
and Turkey against Bulgaria in the second Balkan war. The peace treaty of Bucharest
(1913) marked the end of that conflict and under its provisions Southern Dobrudja
- the Quadrilateral (the Durostor and Caliacra counties) became part of Romania.
|

Ion I.C. Bratianu, Prime Minister of Romania
|
| In August 1914, when World War I broke out, Romania declared
neutrality. Two years later on August 14/27, 1916 it joined the Allies,
which promised support for the accomplishment of national unity; the government
led by Ion I.C. Bratianu declared war on Austria-Hungary. |
After the first success, the Romanian army was
forced to abandon part of the country, Bucharest included and to withdraw to
Moldavia, owing to the joint offensive of the armies in Transylvania, commanded
by General von Falkenhayn and those of Bulgaria, commanded by Marshal von Mackensen.
| In the summer of 1917, in the great battles of Marasti, Marasesti
and Oituz, the Romanians aborted the attempt made by the Central Powers
to defeat and get Romania out of the war by occupying the rest of her territory. |

Fighting at Marasesti - Engraving of WWI |
But the situation changed completely following
the outbreak of the revolution in Russia (1917) and the separate peace concluded
by the Soviets at Brest-Litovsk (March 3, 1918); this triggered the end of the
military operations on the eastern front. Romania was compelled to follow in
the steps of her Russian ally, because on the Moldavian front the Romanian troops
were interspersed with the Russian ones and it was impossible for combat to
continue on one area of the front and for peace to settle on another front area,
and so on. Cut off from its western allies, Romania was forced to sign the peace
treaty of Bucharest with the Central Powers (April 24/May 7, 1918). The ratification
procedure was never carried through, so from the legal standpoint the treaty
was never operative; in fact, in late October 1918, Romania denounced the treaty
and re-entered the war.
|

Romanian army crossed the Carpathians
to free Transylvania, an ancient Romanian land
|
| The right of the peoples to self-rule triumphed in the final
stage of World War I and this served the cause of the Romanians who lived
in the Czarist and Austro-Hungarian Empires. |
The collapse of the czarist system and the recognition
by the Soviet government of the right of the exploited peoples to self-rule
allowed the Romanians in Bessarabia to express through the vote of the national
representative body - the Country Council which convened in Chisinau - their
will to be united with Romania (March 27/April 9, 1918). The fall of the Hapsburg
monarchy in the autumn of 1918 made it possible for the nations that had been
under Austrian-Hungarian oppression to emancipate themselves.
| On November 15/28, 1918, the National Council of Bukovina
voted in Cernauti to unite that province to Romania. |

The Metropolitan Palace of Cernauti, where the union of Bukovina with Romania
was voted (November 28, 1918) |
|

The Great National Assembly of Alba Iulia, on December 1 1918
|
| In Transylvania the National Assembly called at Alba Iulia
on November 18/December 1, 1918 voted, within the presence of over 100,000
delegates, to unite Transylvania and Banat with Romania. |
| So, in January 1919, when the peace conference was inaugurated
in Paris, the union of all Romanians into one single state was an accomplished
fact. |

The act proclaiming the union of Transylvania to the kingdom of Romania
on December 1, 1918 |
The international peace treaties of 1919-1920 signed
at Neuilly, Saint-Germain, Trianon and Paris, established the new European realities
and also sanctioned the union of the provinces that were inhabited by Romanians
into one single state (295,042 square kilometers, with a population of 15.5
million).
The universal suffrage was introduced (1918), a
radical reform was applied (1921), a new Constitution was adopted - one of the
most democratic on the continent (1923) - and all this created a general-democratic
framework and paved the way for a fast economic development (the industrial
output doubled between 1923 and 1938). With its 7.2 million metric tons of produced
oil in 1937, Romania was the second largest European producer and number seven
in the world. The per capita national income reached $94 in 1938 as compared
to Greece - $76, Portugal - $81, Czechoslovakia - $141, and France - $246.
| In politics many parties competed with one another, so the
government was controlled over the years by several of them: the People’s
Party (Alexandru Averescu), the National Liberal Party (Ion I.C.
Bratianu, I.G. Duca, Gheorghe Tatarescu) and the National Peasant Party
(Iuliu Maniu). |

Iuliu Maniu,
President of the National Peasant Party |
The Romanian Communist Party, established in 1921,
and which had an insignificant number of members, was banned in 1924. The Iron
Guard, an extremist right-wing nationalist movement, established by Corneliu
Zelea Codreanu in 1927, was equally banned. In 1930 Carol II changed
his mind about his earlier decision to give up the throne, he dethroned his
minor son, Michael (who had become king in 1927) and he took the throne.
Eight years later he established his personal dictatorship (1938-1940).
|

Nicolae Titulescu, Romanian Foreign Minister,
supporter of collective security in Europe
|
| The goals of the foreign policy in the inter-war period, when
Nicolae Titulescu played a major role, sought to maintain the territorial
status quo by creating regional alliances, supporting the League of Nations
and the collective security policy, as well as by promoting close co-operation
with the Western democracies - France and Great Britain. |
With Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, Romania lay
the foundation in 1920-1921 for the Little Entente and in 1934 Romania created
with Yugoslavia, Greece and Turkey a new organization of regional security -
the Balkan Entente.
Nazi Germany was rising and, together with Italy
it supported the revisionist states neighboring Romania; the force policy was
successful on the continent and this was marked by the Anschluss, the Munich
Pact (1938), the break-up of Czechoslovakia (1939); there was rapprochement
between the Soviet Union and the Third Reich; all this led to Romania’s international
isolation. The von Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact (August 23, 1939) stipulated in a
secret protocol the Soviet "interest" in the Baltic states, eastern Poland and
the Soviet similar "interest" in Bessarabia.
When World War II broke out, Romania declared neutrality
(September 6,1939) but she supported Poland (by facilitating the transit of
the National Bank treasure and granting asylum to the Polish president and
government). The defeats suffered by France and Great Britain in 1940 created
a dramatic situation for Romania.
|
The Soviet government applied Plank 3 of the secret protocol of August
23, 1939 and forced Romania by the ultimatum notes of June 26 and 28,
1940 to cede not only Bessarabia, but also Northern Bukovina and the Hertza
land (the latter two had never belonged to Russia). Under the Vienna "Award"
- actually a dictate - (August 30, 1940) Germany and Italy gave to Hungary
the north-eastern part of Transylvania, where the majority population
was Romanian. Following the Romanian-Bulgarian talks in Craiova, a treaty
was signed on September 7, 1940, under which the south of Dobrudja (the
Quadrilateral) went to Bulgaria.
|

Romania's map with the territorial losses of the '40s |
The serious crisis in the summer of 1940 led to
the abdication of King Carol II in favour of his son Michael I (September 6,
1940); equally, it led to General Ion Antonescu’s take-over of the government
(he became a Marshal in October 1941). In an effort to win support from Germany
and Italy, Ion Antonescu joined forces in government with the Iron Guard
Movement. The Movement attempted by way of the rebellion of January 21-23, 1941
to take over the entire government and, as a result, it was eliminated from
politics.
|

June 22, 1941: the Romanian army crosses the river Prut
to liberate Bessarabia occupied by the Soviets
|
| Wishing to get back the territories lost in 1940, Ion Antonescu
participated, side by side with Germany, in the war against the Soviet Union
(1941-1944). |
The defeats suffered by the Axis powers led after
1942 to enhanced attempts made by Antonescu’s regime, as well as by the democratic
opposition (Iuliu Maniu, C.I.C. Bratianu) to take Romania out of the
alliance with Germany. On August 23, 1944, Marshal Ion Antonescu was arrested
under the order of King Michael I.
| The new government, made up of military men and technocrats,
declared war on Germany (August 24, 1944) and so, Romania brought her whole
economic and military potential into the alliance of the United Nations,
until the end of World War II in Europe. |

Romanian machine gunners in action
in the mountains of Czechoslovakia |
|

The Romanian army was triumphal received
in all the localities of Transylvania
|
| Despite the human and economic efforts Romania had made for
the cause of the United Nations for nine months, the Peace Treaty of Paris
(February 10, 1947) denied Romania the co-belligerent status and forced
her to pay huge war reparation. payments; but the Treaty recognized the
come-back of north-eastern Transylvania to Romania while Bessarabia and
Northern Bukovina stayed annexed to the USSR. |
On the territory of Romania Soviet troops were
stationed and the country was abandoned by the Western powers, so the next stage
brought a similar evolution to that of the other satellites of the Soviet Empire.
The whole government was forcibly taken over by the communists, the political
parties were banned and their members were persecuted and arrested; King Michael
I was forced to abdicate and the same day the people’s republic was proclaimed
(December 30, 1947).
|
The single-party dictatorship was established, based on an omnipotent
and omnipresent surveillance and repression force.
The industrial enterprises, the banks and the transportation means were
nationalized (1948), agriculture was forcibly collectivized (1949-1962),
the whole economy was developed according to five-year plans, the main
goal being a Stalinist type industrialization. Romania became a founding
member of COMECON (1949) and of the Warsaw Treaty (1955).
|

The communists took charge of the state,
guided by their utopian, noxious creed |
At the death of Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej (1965),
the communist leader of the after-war epoch, the party leadership, which was
later identified with that of the state as well, was monopolized by Nicolae
Ceausescu. In a short period of time he managed to concentrate into his
own hands (and those of a clan headed by his wife, Elena Ceausescu) all the
power levers of the communist party and of the state system. Romania distanced
herself from the USSR (this publicy inaugurated in the "Statement" of April
1964); the domestic policy was less rigid and there was some opening in the
foreign policy (Romania was the only Warsaw Treaty member-state that did not
intervene in Czechoslovakia in 1968); all this, as well as the political capital
built on such a less Orthodox line were used to consolidate Ceausescu’s own
position, to take over the whole power within the party and the state. The dictatorship
of the Ceausescu family, one of the most absurd forms of totalitarian government
in the 20th century Europe, with a personality cult that actually bordered on
mental illness, had as a result, among other things, distortions in the economy,
the degradation of the social and moral life, the country’s isolation from the
international community. The country’s resources were abusively used to build
absurdly giant projects devised by the dictator’s megalomania; this also contributed
to a dramatic decline of the population’s living standard and the deepening
of the regime’s crisis.
|

The Romanian Revolution of December 22, 1989
|
|
| Under these circumstances, the spark of the revolt that was
stirred in Timisoara on December 16, 1989 rapidly spread all over the country
and in December 22 the dictatorship was overthrown owing to the sacrifice
of over one thousand lives. |
|